0
Rotter Posted 15 years ago
Grammar

Stomach

The word stomach as a verb is transitive.

However, the following is a correct sentence.

I can't fathom it.

A 26% water rate increase is more than most residents can stomach.

What do you think?
  

Top answer

The verb "to stomach" means, roughly, to tolerate. If you replaced "can stomach" with "can tolerate," would the sentence make sense to you? Or is the entire struture a bit of a puzzle?

  • The verb "to stomach" means, roughly, to tolerate.
  • If you replaced "can stomach" with "can tolerate," would the sentence make sense to you?
  • Or is the entire struture a bit of a puzzle?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

19 Answers
0
The verb "to stomach" means, roughly, to tolerate.

If you replaced "can stomach" with "can tolerate," would the sentence make sense to you? Or is the entire struture a bit of a puzzle?
0
It is a puzzle.

Even the verb tolerate is transitive.

He is clamouring

I can't tolerate. [ WRONG]

I can't tolerate him. [CORRECT]
0
Okay, I know you like to work out at the gym. Let's try a few sentences that might make more sense.

The verb "lift" is also a transitive verb.

I can lift 200 pounds.

200 pounds is not too much for me to lift.

I can't lift 600 pounds.

600 pounds is too much for me to lift.

I can tolerate a small increase in my water bill.

I can't toler
0
Thanks Grammar Geek

Candidly speaking I can't understand these things.

When there is a transitive verb, it can't stand alone.

I have learnt these thing from great friends like you, Clive, CalfJim, Cool Breeze,Khoff, Anonymous, Mister Micawber,Philip and a few others.

I need more help from
0
Most verbs in English can be either transitive or intransitive. Even if a verb is known to be "only" transitive, or "only" intransitive, it can probably still be forced into being intransitive or transitive, respectively. For example, the verbs "tolerate" and "stomach" are supposedly transitive only, but they can be forced into intransitive usage:

He's driving me nuts, but just for the
0
Hi,

Neither of these particular examples sound like something any native speaker would say.

Clive
0
I agree. Those both need an object, even if it's a vague "it."

Rotter, I can only try one more time, and then I need someone with a greater knowledge of how this works linguistically.

See if this series makes sense when you go down this sequence:

I can't lift 600 pounds. It's too heavy

I can't lift this 600 pound weight because it's too heavy.

600 pound
0
Rotter
The word stomach as a verb is transitive.
However, the following is a correct sentence.
...
A 26% water rate increase is more than most residents can stomach.
What do you think?
There's nothing unusual here. The object of a transitive verb doesn't have to occur immediately after the verb. It can be implied by context. It hap
0
Then how about the following:

I tolerate well.

I stomach readily.

I injure easily (injure is trans. or intrans.).
0
Hi,

Then how about the following:

I tolerate well. Sounds odd and unnatural

I stomach readily. Sounds extremely odd and unnatural

I injure easily (injure is trans. or intrans.). OK

Clive

Related Questions