Still have a lot going for it?

Does "still have a lot going for it" mean "still have a lot things to support it"?

Context:
If the argument of this chapter is accepted, the factual premise
of religion - the God Hypothesis - is untenable. God almost cer-
tainly does not exist. This is the main conclusion of the book so far.
Various questions now follow. Even if we accept that God doesn't
exist, doesn't religion still have a lot going for it? Isn't it consoling?