0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Statement of Facts: Simple Present vs. Simple Past

Hi,

I am preparing for an interview and writing about my accomplishments in the past, which are, to me, a personal fact about myself. I was wondering which of the following sentences is correct:

1. My past accomplishments are the result of my hard work and are proof of what I can contribute to your organisation.

2. My past accomplishments were the result of my hard work and were proof of what I can contribute to your organisation.

Is #1 correct on the basis that this is a statement of fact or truth about myself, thus simple present are is used? Or is #2 correct because of the phrase "past accomplishments", thus simple past were is used?

I would very much appreciate your help here.
  

Top answer

"were proof of" in #2 seems definitely wrong in your context. "

  • "were proof of" in #2 seems definitely wrong in your context.
  • "
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
"were proof of" in #2 seems definitely wrong in your context.

#1 seems passable, but I'm wondering if this might be better:

"My past accomplishments have been the result of my hard work and are proof of what I can contribute to your organisation."
0
Thank you for your response, but could you kindly explain what the difference is between using are and have been in my sentence?

Related Questions