" No. " IF not, why not? Thanks.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AngliholicFirstly, is it correct to replace "named" in the above with "regarded?"No. In this context "named" means "officially designated."
AngliholicSecond, does "highlights" amount to "spotlights?" IF not, why not? Thanks."spotlights" is acceptable but uncommon in a situation like this, instead try "emphasizes."
RayHAngliholicFirstly, is it correct to replace "named" in the above with "regarded?"No. In this context "named" means "officially designated."AngliholicSecond, does "highlights" amount to "spotlights?" IF not, why not? Thanks."spotlights" is acceptable but uncommon in a situation like this