Rio is a Brazilian city which (that) has a lot of attractions
Mustn't there be a comma in front of noun phrases with indefinite articles all the time?
I have some sentences written with a comma and indefinite articles. Are they grammatically wrong
or is there some difference among them?
We saw a marmoset, which is a type of monkey.
I mentioned the idea to a work colleague, who agreed with it.
What do you native English speakers think? Thank you so much as usual in advance.
Hans51 Mustn't there be a comma in front of noun phrases with indefinite articles all the time? No. ) 1) Rio is a Brazilian city which (that) has a lot of attractions .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hans51Mustn't there be a comma in front of noun phrases with indefinite articles all the time?
No. (You're talking about relative clauses, not noun phrases.)
1) Rio is a Brazilian city which (that) has a lot of attractions. Fine.
2) I mentioned the idea to a work colleague who agreed with it. Fine.
In 1 you contrast one city