0
Snuppelina Posted 14 years ago
Grammar
Some science
Is it correct to say (could anyone please correct):
"The increase in oxygen content with increasing of pressure of carbon confirms the change in stoichiometry of its structure formed with high hydrogen content"
The idea is that the increase in carbon pressure results in the increase in oxygen content, and all this proves the fact that the stoichiometry of its structure, which is formed with help of hydrogen content, changes.
"The increase in oxygen content with increasing of pressure of carbon confirms the change in stoichiometry of its structure formed with high hydrogen content"
The idea is that the increase in carbon pressure results in the increase in oxygen content, and all this proves the fact that the stoichiometry of its structure, which is formed with help of hydrogen content, changes.
Top answer
I suggest this: The increase in oxygen content with increasing carbon pressure confirms the change in its high-hydrogen stoichiometry .
- I suggest this: The increase in oxygen content with increasing carbon pressure confirms the change in its high-hydrogen stoichiometry .
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
9 Answers
0
I suggest this:
The increase in oxygen content with increasing carbon pressure confirms the change in its high-hydrogen stoichiometry.
The increase in oxygen content with increasing carbon pressure confirms the change in its high-hydrogen stoichiometry.
00
Thank you very much!
Could you please tell me whether it's possible to say this:
"the heating rate varied in the range of 4 to 10 degrees" and
"after holding at this temperature, the samples were cooled..." --it means that samples were held at some temperature for some time before then were cooled. As for me, there should be a noun after holding, it doesn't sound like to me
Could you please tell me whether it's possible to say this:
"the heating rate varied in the range of 4 to 10 degrees" and
"after holding at this temperature, the samples were cooled..." --it means that samples were held at some temperature for some time before then were cooled. As for me, there should be a noun after holding, it doesn't sound like to me
00
the heating rate varied by 4 to 10 degrees
after being held at this temperature (for X minutes), the samples were cooled
after being held at this temperature (for X minutes), the samples were cooled
00
Thank you very much, really appreciate it.
This is what I was also thinking - the original phrase was wrong.
"After being held" is a great option, maybe also "after holding samples for XX minutes, they were cooled."
This is what I was also thinking - the original phrase was wrong.
"After being held" is a great option, maybe also "after holding samples for XX minutes, they were cooled."
00
snuppelinaafter holding samples for XX minutes, they were cooled.No, then they are holding themselves. No good.
00
0
Just one more question:
After having been connected, the moderator was purged with nitrogen.
or
After being connected, the moderator was purged with nitrogen.
After having been connected, the moderator was purged with nitrogen.
or
After being connected, the moderator was purged with nitrogen.
00
Both are in use; the first is rather clunky, and quite unnecessary.
00
Thank you!
I was just thinking there were some peculiarities with tenses there.
I was just thinking there were some peculiarities with tenses there.
0
Related Questions