It is believed that the most effective ways to minimize the amount of time spent in going to work place is relocating the parks as well as gardens, which will be replaced by apartment buildings for commuters, but some people do not see eye to eye with this sentiment. In this essay, I will analyze both sides of view, and then demonstrate my viewpoints.

on the on hand, replacing parks and gardens as long as constructing more apartment buildings for commuters can help them not only saving traveling time to work but it also gives commuters more time to accomplish others activities . Because during the traveling time, instead of sitting on a public transport, they can come back home immediately after working time and reunite with their families. In addition, living near workplace also confine the amount of money, which is utilized for innovating transportation and allocates it for other essential purposes.

on the other hand, although those advantages are undeniable, I believe the drawbacks still outweighs. When people live too near their workplace, they hardly find a free room, which can result in heavy pressure at work because though they are at home, the company still reminds them of unaccomplished works. It also can be easily seen that wherever are lack of parks or gardens brings people the feeling of uncomfortable and heavy breathing. This is the repercussion of living in an ungreen place.

in conclusion, it is uneasy to make a decision which viewpoint is acceptable since everyone share an own opinion. Thus, I still keep my mindset unchanged that the disadvantages of this sentiment vanish the range of benefits.