0
Felixxx Posted 13 years ago
Grammar
Some confused sentences
they were “very unlikely” to donate them to another couple trying to have a baby.
Is it a relative clause ? Couple is the object so that can be wrote without who ? Couple who trying to have a baby .
it’s hard to for many couples to get past knowing that someone else would be raising their biological children
What is this ? To for ?
I don't understand why there are two conj.
It's hard for many couples to get ..... Isn't it mean the same ?
Thanks guys
Is it a relative clause ? Couple is the object so that can be wrote without who ? Couple who trying to have a baby .
it’s hard to for many couples to get past knowing that someone else would be raising their biological children
What is this ? To for ?
I don't understand why there are two conj.
It's hard for many couples to get ..... Isn't it mean the same ?
Thanks guys
Top answer
Felixxx T hey were “very unlikely” to donate them to another couple trying to have a baby. Is it a relative clause ? Is what a relative clause?
- Felixxx T hey were “very unlikely” to donate them to another couple trying to have a baby.
- Is it a relative clause ?
- Is what a relative clause?
- There are no relative clauses here.
- trying to have a baby modifies couple .
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
FelixxxThey were “very unlikely” to donate them to another couple trying to have a baby. Is it a relative clause ?Is what a relative clause? There are no relative clauses here.
trying to have a baby modifies couple. It can be replaced by who were trying to have a baby, if
0
Related Questions