0
Anonymous Posted 20 years ago
Linguistics Studies

So a noun is an adjective?

What's wrong with this description?

"We can also use a noun (e.g. television) as an adjective. We can put it before a noun (e.g. programme)." [OPG, p.190]
  

Top answer

Which part do you think is wrong, Anon? MrP

  • Which part do you think is wrong, Anon?
  • MrP
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

14 Answers
0
Which part do you think is wrong, Anon?

MrP
0
AnonymousWhat's wrong with this description?

"We can also use a noun (e.g. television) as an adjective. We can put it before a noun (e.g. programme)." [OPG, p.190]
A noun can't always be used adjectivally. For example man clothes is wrong.

Cheers
CB
0
The statement doesn't say that a noun can always be so used.

Do you take this as wrong

We can use compounds of chlorine to whiten clothes.


because common table salt is a chlorine compound, and it can't used to whiten clothes?

If there's something wrong with the statement about nouns, it must be something else.

CJ
0
Anonymous
What's wrong with this description?

"We can also use a noun (e.g. television) as an adjective. We can put it before a noun (e.g. programme)." [OPG, p.190]

A noun is never an adjective, but it we say that certain nouns can be used adjectivally (i.e. when adjectivally means "in an adjectival manner") t
0
Confusion of terminology is the problem there.

Yes. And the problem runs even deeper into the whole idea of word classes ("parts of speech"). In your example, the obvious question is "Does the noun (television) remain a noun when used as an adjective, or does it become an adjective, or does it become both a noun and an adjective at the same time?"
0
MilkyA noun is never an adjective, but it we say that certain nouns can be used adjectivally (i.e. when adjectivally means "in an adjectival manner") to modify another noun. Confusion of terminology is the problem there.

Adverb


0
CalifJim
Confusion of terminology is the problem there.
Yes. And the problem runs even deeper into the whole idea of word classes ("parts of speech"). In your example, the obvious question is "Does the noun (television) remain a noun when used as an adjective, or does it become an adjective, or does it become both a noun and an adjective at
0
<If your definition of "adjectivally" is "as an adjective", there seems no reason why "as an adjective" shouldn't stand in the original sentence.>

Did you miss this bit?

<<but it we say that certain nouns can be used adjectivally (i.e. when adjectivally means "in an adjectival manner")>>

--------------

Qui
0
"We can also use a noun as an adjective" = "we can use a noun adjectivally".

But I would prefer to hear from the original poster. We may be entirely on the wrong track, as far as he's concerned.

MrP
0
Adjective behaving nominally.
In other words, an adjective behaving like a noun (usually behaves).
Along with Mr. P. I don't see the difference between "can be used as an adjective" and "can be used adjectivally".
I, too, think the original poster might have had something different in mind in thinking that something was wrong with the statement shown in the

Related Questions