Accuracy - inherently yes, but "so that" is probably not what is meant. That says that forests are being cut down with the purpose of making animals leave. However, "A lot of animals leave their natural habitat because forests are [being] cut down" and "A lot of animals are leaving their natural habitat because forests are [being] cut down" are both correct (order switched).
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Leah SAccuracy - inherently yes, but "so that" is probably not what is meant. That says that forests are being cut down with the purpose of making animals leave. However, "A lot of animals leave their natural habitat because forests are [being] cut down" and "A lot of animals are leaving their natural habitat because forests are [being] cut down" are both correct (order s
nsfs2Can 'so far' not be used to express result?The issue in the original question was about "so that". Is that what you meant or is this a separate question?
nsfs2Can 'so far' not be used to express result?Or there is something else I'm missing?I need further elaboration on that,please.Sorry.Can 'so that' not '
Word warrior23Hi.Please note that what looks like the present simple form in the first sentence is actually subjunctive. You cannot say: “Forests are cut down so that the particular species leaves its natural habitat.” The verb would still have to be “leave”. “So that” is a resulting conjunctional phrase and takes a subjunctive or modal verb. Therefore, what you want to s
nsfs2I want to express result and I've read that one can use' so that' for introducing a result clause.Here is the following example:'They turned the radio up, so that everybody heard the announcement',This is correct. I think your confusion is about which part of the sentence is the result. (I, in turn, am not really sure how best to explain this.)
Leah SI hope this has not confused you too muchIt has indeed.Thanks,anyway.