0
Anonymous Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

Simple past Vs. Past perfect Tense

0Hi,02br
02br
00I was wondering if someone can explain to me the difference between simple past and past perfect tense. When would you use one vs the other? For example, When would you say...02br
02br
00I had sent out an email yesterday02br
02br
00and..02br
02br
00I sent out an email yesterday02br
02br
00When would you 01b00have02b00 to use past perfect?02br
02br
00Thanks.0-
  

Top answer

0Almost never, and certainly not in your example. Use past perfect when there are two past events in the same statement, and it is not clear which one came first, and you wish to clarify that relationship. 05000 is a bit more on the same.

  • 0Almost never, and certainly not in your example.
  • Use past perfect when there are two past events in the same statement, and it is not clear which one came first, and you wish to clarify that relationship.
  • 05000 is a bit more on the same.
  • htm
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

25 Answers
0
0Almost never, and certainly not in your example. Use past perfect when there are two past events in the same statement, and it is not clear which one came first, and you wish to clarify that relationship. 05000 is a bit more on the same. 0230hrefhttp://web2.uvcs.uvic.ca/elc/studyzone/410/grammar/pastpf.htm
0
0I had sent out an email yesterday. (incorrect)02br
02br
00When time is stated, you need to use the Simple Past Tense.02br
02br
00Other examples:02br
02br
00I woke up late yesterday.02br
02br
00I was late for school last Monday.02br
02br
00After I 01b00had sent02b00 an email
0
0I think the last example is still correct without 'had', though, it is clearer with 'had'. This is because 'after' provides information on event sequence.02br
02br
01font00After02font00 I 01b00sent02b00 an email to my friend yesterday, I received a reply from him soon after.02br
02br
00Am I r
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10New2grammar12cite12br
10I think the last example is still correct without 'had', though, it is clearer with 'had'. This is because 'after' provides information on event sequence.12br
12br
11font10After12font10 I 11b10sent12b10 an email to
0
0 When telling the story of something that happened in the past, you may want to refer back to situations which were in effect before the time the story happened. In that case you use the past perfect. Without establishing the past point of view there's no need for the past perfect tense.02br
02br
00 You would have to use the past perfect in reporting the present perfe
0
hi , I can help you

I will explaine to you .....

For exemple there are too action ( too verbs) always you put the first action in past perfect & the second action in the past EXEMPLE: I had met my wife ,i married her.( you hav to meet befor to marry, you can not marry and after you meet)

I hope you understand

r2VwK
0
We use Simple Past if we give past events in the order in which they occured. However, when we look back from a certain time in the past to tell what had happened before, we use Past Perfect. In addition, as what my professor told us before, when we use the past perfect tense of the verb we should not indicate the time expression.

-don
0
AnonymousI will explaine to you ..... For exemple there are too actions ( too verbs) always you put the first action in past perfect & the second action in the past EXEMPLE: I had met my wife ,i
0
Anonymouswhen we use the past perfect tense of the verb we should not indicate the time expression
This statement is only correct if you substitute 'present perfect' for 'past perfect'.

CJ
0
Anonymousexcellent answer
Study following carefully:-
1. I reached the station when the rain left.
2. I reached the station when the train had stared.
3. I reached the station before the train started.
4. The train started after I reached the station.

In 1 none can tell the time of first action, in 2 'had left' shows it's action being

Related Questions