0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Simple past and past perfect

I refer to a past statement from which it is clear that ("in fact") I did do/had done something. That which I did is (formally) before the statement in time. However the logical relationship (that I did do/had done something) can be seen as a general reference to the past which is not dependent on the past statement itself.

So I wonder whether to use simple past or past perfect to refer to the time which is (formally) before the statement.
  

Top answer

" Or it's apparently the same to say: "I said that I did" Okay, I don't find it controversial anymore that it is fine and in fact normal to use simple past. But the problem is originally more complicated, I'm afraid. Because the context is a reference to a point in the past when I didn't do something and so appear to have not done it all.

  • " Or it's apparently the same to say: "I said that I did" Okay, I don't find it controversial anymore that it is fine and in fact normal to use simple past.
  • But the problem is originally more complicated, I'm afraid.
  • Because the context is a reference to a point in the past when I didn't do something and so appear to have not done it all.
  • So I must use past perfect.
  • Also that is clear enough.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
E.g.: "From what I said it is clear that I did do/had done..."
Or it's apparently the same to say: "I said that I did"

Okay, I don't find it controversial anymore that it is fine and in fact normal to use simple past.

But the problem is originally more complicated, I'm afraid.

Because the context is a reference to a point in the past when I didn't do something and so

Related Questions