0
Taka Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Similar

The studies had a number of other similar characteristics.

One of the books I have says strictly speaking "other similar" is wrong and shouldn't be used in formal writing.

Is it really so?
  

Top answer

Taka Is it really so? I see nothing wrong with it (as long as that sentence is preceded by the mention of at least one similar characteristic). What does your book say should replace it?

  • Taka Is it really so?
  • I see nothing wrong with it (as long as that sentence is preceded by the mention of at least one similar characteristic).
  • What does your book say should replace it?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

15 Answers
0
TakaIs it really so?
I see nothing wrong with it (as long as that sentence is preceded by the mention of at least one similar characteristic). What does your book say should replace it?
0
It says it should be either "similar+noun (pl)" or "other+noun(pl)" since "similar" itself implies others. And it goes on to say that it's the same kind of mistake as these below:

·nearly almost
·other fellow passengers
·return back
·repeat again
0
TakaIt says it should be either "similar+noun (pl)" or "other+noun(pl)" since "similar" itself implies others
Yes, without the context I suggested above.
0
Let's say a friend of mine has made a mistake. Then if I said to him "Don't make other similar mistakes", would it sound redundant and awkward as those examples above?
0
Takahen if I said to him "Don't make other similar mistakes", would it sound redundant
Yes.
Taka awkward
No; it is a common natural utterance. The spoken language in particular is rife with redundancies: it is a communication aid.
0
Good.

One more thing. About "repeat again". Isn't it that it's not wrong but it sounds awkward to mean a single repetition and that it means a different thing?
0
TakaIsn't it that it's not wrong but it sounds awkward to mean a single repetition and that it means a different thing?
That is indeed a conundrum.
0
Really? Is it that difficult?

You repeat and end the repetition. And you start the next repetition. You have repeated again.

I thought it could be interpreted that way.
0
TakaI thought it could be interpreted that way.
Of course it can, but many will argue that 'again' remains redundant there.
0
Mister Micawber but many will argue that 'again' remains redundant there.
Will they? If you want someone to conduct the second doing after he ends the first doing, I think you will say "Do it again."

How would you say it if you want him to do the second repetition?

Related Questions