0
Anonymous Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

should vs shall

hello, i have got a question
(if we don't make too many mistakes we should be ok).here in this sentence is it right to use (should)????or (shall) is the correct one???????., please answer my question
kind regards
K. A
  

Top answer

"should" is correct. Some people may prefer to put a comma after "mistakes". Some more tips: Try to use capital letters correctly.

  • "should" is correct.
  • Some people may prefer to put a comma after "mistakes".
  • Some more tips: Try to use capital letters correctly.
  • Every sentence must begin with a capital letter.
  • The word "I" must always be capitalised, wherever it occurs.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

60 Answers
0
"should" is correct. Some people may prefer to put a comma after "mistakes".

Some more tips:

Try to use capital letters correctly. Every sentence must begin with a capital letter. The word "I" must always be capitalised, wherever it occurs. I prefer to capitalise "OK".

Do not put the words and sentences that you are asking about in brackets. Use "quotation marks" or i
0
Me or your own self
0
Anonymous Me or your own self
It's not clear what your question is. In which sentences do you want to use these words?

CJ
0
CalifJim
thanks for your answer and your comments
but here if I say
" If we don't make too many mistakes, we shall be ok."
Is correct to use "shall" instead of "should" . And you wrote to me before that should is correct, why? because as you know that "should" here is the past form of "shall" while the sentence is in present form "first conditional".
please answer
kind
0
Anonymous"should" here is the past form of "shall"
Only historically. The English language has changed a great deal since the tensed forms of the modals were actually used as tensed forms. For all practical purposes, "should" is a present tense modal verb in modern English.
AnonymousIs it correct t
0
In the UK, "shall" is still moderately common in first-person questions, e.g. "Shall we go out for a walk this afternoon?". I naturally use it like this myself. It is occasionally heard in first-person statements too, e.g. "We shall see about that", and in in official/legal documents or instructions where there is intended to be a sense of force or compulsion, e.g. "This agreement shall remain in
0
Just in case anyone is interested:

Shall we go out for a walk this afternoon? Also American.
We shall see about that. Not typically American.
This agreement shall remain in force until 31 December 2015. Also American.

CJ
0
thanks for your answers, but what made me confused was that:
the first part of the sentence is present" If we don't make too many mistakes', but in the second part " should" comes instead of " shall" as one of you said should here is the past form of shall, it means that it is correct to use"would" instead of "should". correct?
answer please
best regards
CA
0
Anonymousin the second part " should" comes instead of " shall" as one of you said should here is the past form of shall
Well, it wasn't me, so I assume your question is addressed to someone else. I'll go back and reread the thread.

* * *

OK. I checked the thread, and nobody on this thread said that 'should' is the past form of 'shall'. It
0
CalifJim"would" is extremely rarely possible as a substitute for "should".
I agree. That ageing minority of us speakers of BrE who use shall instead of will for the first-person way of expressing the future use should for the backshifted form. Most people use would. Although learners may hear/see should used in this way occas

Related Questions