0
NL888 Posted 13 years ago
Grammar
Should 'sequester" be "sequestering"? Because the former is a verb.
Context:
"We are the world's most powerful military, and we use that to promote peace and stability in the world," Panetta said. "It would be a shameful act of irresponsibility if Congress just stood to the side and let sequester take place. It would turn America from a first-rate power into a second-rate power."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/01/panetta-usa-today-interview/1884447/
"We are the world's most powerful military, and we use that to promote peace and stability in the world," Panetta said. "It would be a shameful act of irresponsibility if Congress just stood to the side and let sequester take place. It would turn America from a first-rate power into a second-rate power."
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/01/panetta-usa-today-interview/1884447/
Top answer
` It should be sequestration — a process referred to earlier in the article. Rover
- ` It should be sequestration — a process referred to earlier in the article.
- Rover
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
`
It should be sequestration— a process referred to earlier in the article.
Rover
It should be sequestration— a process referred to earlier in the article.
Rover
0
Related Questions