0
Tamguatlay Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

Should it be "have" instead?

Almost half of the world's tropical rainforests has already been destroyed.

Should it be "have" instead of "has"?

Thanks.
  

Top answer

tamguatlay Should it be "have" instead of "has"? Yes. CJ

— CalifJim

  • tamguatlay Should it be "have" instead of "has"?
  • Yes.
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
tamguatlayShould it be "have" instead of "has"?
Yes.

CJ
0

Related Questions