0
SuperESL Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Should have thought

"Professor Ryle in his letter today seeks to defend his refusal to review Mr. Gellner's book in the Journal of Mind on the ground that the book contains imputations of disingenuousness against a number of philosophers. Whether it does or not I do not know, but if the imputations are justified this could not be a good ground, while if they are not I should have thought a review in Mind would provide an excellent opportunity to rebut them."

Can "should think" definitely not replace "should have thought" in the above passage?

Thank you.
  

Top answer

SuperESL Can "should think" definitely not replace "should have thought" in the above passage? No. CJ

— CalifJim

  • SuperESL Can "should think" definitely not replace "should have thought" in the above passage?
  • No.
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
SuperESLCan "should think" definitely not replace "should have thought" in the above passage?
No.

CJ
0
0
Does "should have thought" function here exactly like "would have thought"?

Thank you.
0

Related Questions