Should have drank vs. drunk, should have drove vs. driven

AnonymousThere seems to so many grammatical errors even among the native eng. speakers.
Could anyone give me a crear answer for the questions?

Which one is correct?
(1) I should have drank a non-alcohol cocktail. (But indeed I didnt drink a non-alcohol cocktail)
Or I should have drunk a non-alcohol cocktail.

(2) I should have drove to the w

Thanks, CJ.

I wanted to edit my first post, but found difficulty. That's why I had to resort to posting again with the edited version.

I believe it is should have driven beacause even in spanish you need to use the perfect form of the second word. its a compound sentence in the present perfect form in spanish as well as english. Drove is past tense (i.e I drove yesterday) whereas driven is the perfect (i.e I should have driven yesterday)

1)

I should have drank a non-alcohol cocktail at the party.

Drunk is past( you have already done it)

I drunk a non-alcohol cocktail last night.

2)

I should have driven to work instead of taking the bus.

Drove is past( is has happened0

I drove my husband's car to work.

It is funny that I had the same confusion for these two wor

Anonymous1)I should have drank a non-alcohol cocktail at the party.

Drunk is past( you have already done it)

I drunk a non-alcohol cocktail last night.

I'm sorry, but this is completely wrong!

Drank is the simple past. I drank too much last night. I drank a large Diet Coke and now my teeth are floating.

Drunk is the

1. I should have drunk a non-alcoholic bev.

2. I should/should not have driven home.

it is of course "I have drunk"and "I have driven". But language is an always changing entity, what is considered wrong nowadays, might become over a period of time an accepted way of speech. I hear "I have drove" more and more, it hurts my ears but add one century and it might be fully accepted while "I have drunk" by then may sound old-fashioned. If you have a problem with this, then juist read a