0
Reegis Posted 10 years ago
Grammar
She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket without proper documents.
Hello,
please let's have a look at the sentences below:
1) She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket without proper documents.
2) She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket, without proper documents.
3) She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket and without proper documents.
- Are they correct and mean the same?
- Can 1) be interpreted that it was actually the ticket that didn't have proper documents?
- Which one sounds best?
please let's have a look at the sentences below:
1) She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket without proper documents.
2) She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket, without proper documents.
3) She was fined for travelling on an invalid ticket and without proper documents.
- Are they correct and mean the same?
- Can 1) be interpreted that it was actually the ticket that didn't have proper documents?
- Which one sounds best?
Top answer
Are they correct and mean the same? Yes - Can 1) be interpreted that it was actually the ticket that didn't have proper documents? Yes, but that seems to me a rather silly interpretation.
- Are they correct and mean the same?
- Yes - Can 1) be interpreted that it was actually the ticket that didn't have proper documents?
- Yes, but that seems to me a rather silly interpretation.
- - Which one sounds best?
- #3
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Are they correct and mean the same? Yes
- Can 1) be interpreted that it was actually the ticket that didn't have proper documents? Yes, but that seems to me a rather silly interpretation.
- Which one sounds best? #3
- Can 1) be interpreted that it was actually the ticket that didn't have proper documents? Yes, but that seems to me a rather silly interpretation.
- Which one sounds best? #3
0
Related Questions