0
Mr. Tom Posted 11 years ago
Grammar

She subdued/suppressed her ambition...

Hi

Are these expressions natural and do they carry the same meaning?

She subdued her ambition to the needs of her family.
She suppressed her ambition to the needs of her family.

Thanks,

Tom
  

Top answer

"Subdue" means to quiet or overcome. "Suppress" means to conceal. Neither of these verbs is idiomatic with to+object.

  • "Subdue" means to quiet or overcome.
  • "Suppress" means to conceal.
  • Neither of these verbs is idiomatic with to+object.
  • "
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
"Subdue" means to quiet or overcome. "Suppress" means to conceal. Neither of these verbs is idiomatic with to+object. I think the word you want is "subordinated."
0
Thanks, deadrat.

I have two questions. 1) What about the word subjugate? Does that work with here?

She subjugated her ambition to the needs of her family

2) Do the original sentences with the words subdue and suppress sound wrong to your native ears? Or just less natural?

Tom
0
"Subjugate" means vanquish, which isn't quite right here, and like "subdue" and "suppress," it won't work with "to the needs." All three sound wrong to my ears.
0
Thanks a lot deadrat and MM.

It took me a few days to respond because I couldn't recall at all where I had seen the original sentence. No, it was not suppress or subdue, but it was subjugate.

Can we discuss it a bit further please?

0
Sure enough. There it is with the imprimatur of Oxford, no less:

Her personal ambitions had been subjugated to (= considered less important than) the needs of her family.

"Subjugate" comes form the Latin "sub" (under) + "jugum" (yoke), and it always takes the sense of one party conquering or bringing under complete control another party. This isn't to say that the

Related Questions