0
Anonymous Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

She had a dog, which she loved very much, and which was a comfort to he

I'd be happy if someone would answer my question. Thanks in advance.

Q 1. Are the following 2 sentences the same in meaning?

A: She had a dog, which she loved very much, and which was a comfort to her.

B: She had a dog. She loved it very much, and it was a comfort to her.

Q 2. In B, can "it" ('the underlined part) be replaced by "that" or "this"?
  

Top answer

Q1 - Yes, they mean the same thing. Q2 - Neither was underlined, but I think you mean the second one. No, that changes the meaning.

  • Q1 - Yes, they mean the same thing.
  • Q2 - Neither was underlined, but I think you mean the second one.
  • No, that changes the meaning.
  • It would mean that "her love for the dog" was a comfort, not that the dog was comfort to her.
  • Perhaps it was a comfort to her that she loved the dog - perhaps someone had once told her that she was incapable of love, but the fact that she could love her dog showed that she was capable of love after all.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
Q1 - Yes, they mean the same thing.

Q2 - Neither was underlined, but I think you mean the second one. No, that changes the meaning. It would mean that "her love for the dog" was a comfort, not that the dog was comfort to her. Perhaps it was a comfort to her that she loved the dog - perhaps someone had once told her that she was incapable of love, but the fact that she could love her dog s

Related Questions