0
Oceanatali Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Shades of English

I've got two sentences. "I've worked there for three years" and "I've been working there for 3 years". Grammar teaches us there's no difference in meaning in both sentences. But I can't believe it. I feel there are some nuances, shades etc. What can you say?
  

Top answer

The progressive aspect often suggests duration, but, with verbs such as live and work that in themselves indicate a situation that has duration, there is often no real difference in meaning between the progressive and non progressive forms of the present perfect.

  • The progressive aspect often suggests duration, but, with verbs such as live and work that in themselves indicate a situation that has duration, there is often no real difference in meaning between the progressive and non progressive forms of the present perfect.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
The progressive aspect often suggests duration, but, with verbs such as live and work that in themselves indicate a situation that has duration, there is often no real difference in meaning between the progressive and non progressive forms of the present perfect.
0
In US English (fivejedjon is British), there is a nuance between the two.

A: "Where do you work?"

B: "At Joe's Pancake House."

A: "How long have you worked there?"

B: "I've worked there for three years." (This is a neutral sentence. The speaker is simply giving out information concerning the duration of his employment at a certain establishment.)

0
Oceanatali I've got two sentences. "I've worked there for three years" and "I've been working there for 3 years". Grammar teaches us there's no difference in meaning in both sentences. But I can't believe it. I feel there are some nuances, shades etc. What can you say?
The continuous tenses can suggest something temporary, but working somewhere for three years

Related Questions