0 1. After "If I", we must make the next word past tense ? Like If I SAT next to you, or If I SIT next to you ?02br 02br 002. Why doesn't have instead of doesn't has ? Since doesn't means singular and has is categorized as singular ? He doesn't have instead of doesn't has ?02br 02br 003. Why "let it go" instead of "let it goes" ? I thought "it" stands for singular ? And they for plural .. 0-
Top answer
0 1. Will it be ok if I sit next to you? Would it be ok if I sat next to you?
— Philip
0 1.
Will it be ok if I sit next to you?
Would it be ok if I sat next to you?
01b 00Both are correct,02br 02b 002.
The form of the auxiliary verb agrees with the subject: Does he have?
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 1. Will it be ok if I sit next to you? Would it be ok if I sat next to you? 01b00Both are correct,02br 02b002. The form of the auxiliary verb agrees with the subject: Does he have? Do you have? Do they have?02br 003. 'Let it go' is a case of the pure infinitive ('to' is eliminated. [Let us know, make me understand] 0-
01. After "If I" you don't have to make the next word past tense, no.02br 002. See 05000.02br 003. In 01i00Let it go02i00, 01i00go02i00 is an infinitive without 01i00to02i00 -- a bare infinitive -- invariable -- not an inflected form.02br 01i00Let it go. Let us go. Let them
0 Thanks, CJ, for clearing up something for me. In my post just before yours I used the term 'pure' for the infinitive. I knew that wasn't the term I wanted, but I couldn't come up with 'bare' at the time. 0-
0There are so many terms for the same thing, I just thought that pure infinitive was another term for bare infinitive. Pretty good for a made-up term! 05002br 00I think there are other terms for it, too, but they are slipping out of my sieve-like mind just now.02br 00CJ 010id1