0
Hanuman_2000 Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

Sentence type

Hello,

1. He came from school and went for tuition.

Is this a compound sentence?

The above can be divided into

a) He came from school.
b) He went for tuition.

So I think it is a compound sentence.

Please comment on it.

Thanks.
  

Top answer

He came from school and went for tuition. There is one subject in the sentence. When you analyze sentences, you can't add new words, because you will be analyzing a different sentence, not the original.

  • He came from school and went for tuition.
  • There is one subject in the sentence.
  • When you analyze sentences, you can't add new words, because you will be analyzing a different sentence, not the original.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
He came from school and went for tuition.

There is one subject in the sentence. When you analyze sentences, you can't add new words, because you will be analyzing a different sentence, not the original.
0
Hello,

So It is a simple sentence.

"AND" joins 'came from school' and "went for tuition".

It means the conjunction "and" joins , here, two verb phrases.

Am I right?
------------------------------------------------

One more question:

2. Although in poor health, she continued to carry out her duties.
Is it a complex sentence?
0
hanuman_20002. Although in poor health, she continued to carry out her duties.
Is it a complex sentence?
How shall I analyse it?
Didn’t you already get an answer to this?

0
hanuman_2000It means the conjunction "and" joins , here, two verb phrases.
That is correct. You have a compound verb, not a compound sentence.
hanuman_2000One more question:2. Although in poor health, she continued to carry out her duties. Is it a complex sentence?How shall I analyse it?Thanks.
2. Although in poor health, s
0
AlpheccaStars"to carry" is a non-finite (not inflected verb) that is a complement to the main verb
I would say that it’s not just to carry that is complement but the entire clause to carry out her duties. There is a tendency in traditional grammar to assign functions like subject, modifier, object only to the head of an expression, but it makes a
0
Gus; I was being a bit lazy in mentioning only the head and not the attendant elements.

If you count the verb-less clause, the main clause and the complement clause, would you classify the original sentence as being complex, with three clauses? Traditional grammars would not count the non-finite clauses when classifying a sentence.
Suppose we remove the verbless clause:
0
The grammar I subscribe to doesn’t find the distinction between ‘simple sentences’ and ‘complex sentences’ to be very useful, and makes no use of the terms. If it did, then even sentences as short and basic as I will go (where go is analyzed as a subordinate clause) would be classified as ‘complex’.

Related Questions