Hello, thank you in advance!
this is an English teacher in Korea, and has come across a sentence that I find hard to explain the structure.
My peer teachers and I have conflicting opinions on how to explain it to our students, so here I am, asking for native English teachers' help! Thank you again!
The sentence that has become an issue is below:
So basically anyone that comes up to this artificial climbing wall with a disability that would like to try climbing we can make that happen.
hypothesis 1: So basically (if there is) anyone that comes up to
hypothesis 2: So basically (for) anyone that comes up to ..
Which seems more legitimate, or is there an alternative explanation?
Hypothesis #3: it's ungrammatical and badly written/punctuated. Where did you come across it? By the way, you're welcome to join the forum.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hypothesis #3: it's ungrammatical and badly written/punctuated.
Where did you come across it?
By the way, you're welcome to join the forum. It's totally free.
Thank you, again! Now I have a better understanding of how the sentence should have been constructed.