Sentence structure analysis?
This is an opportunity for the petitioner to articulate further details, provides additional evidence in regards to how the evidence submitted in the intitial filling, or in response to this Request for Evidence establishes that the beneficiary meets the requirements regarding the required high level of expertise for the immigrant classification.
1. Hi. Why is the first underlined part not “details and provide”?
2. I cannot understand the grammar structure of the second underlined part. Could you please analyze it?
Thank you.
Top answer
Apparently it should read: This is an opportunity for the petitioner to articulate further details, and provides additional evidence ... The subject of "provides" is "this". If it said "provide" then the (implied) subject would be "the petitioner".
- Apparently it should read: This is an opportunity for the petitioner to articulate further details, and provides additional evidence ...
- The subject of "provides" is "this".
- If it said "provide" then the (implied) subject would be "the petitioner".
- The next part of the sentence is mispunctuated, and "filling" is presumably a typo for "filing".
- Either the comma after "filing" should be deleted, or another one should be added after "Request for Evidence".
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Apparently it should read:
This is an opportunity for the petitioner to articulate further details, and provides additional evidence ...
The subject of "provides" is "this". If it said "provide" then the (implied) subject would be "the petitioner".
The next part of the sentence is mispunctuated, and "filling" is presumably a typo for "filing". Either the comma a
0
Related Questions