The first sentence is in the past and should reflect that: If I (had) wanted to go, I would have asked you. ) The second sentence is in the future, so the wording is correct as is. If the question was in the present, then you could use "would": If I were wanting to go, I would ask you.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Doctor DThe first sentence is in the past and should reflect that:If I (had) wanted to go, I would have asked you. (So, no, "will" is not possible.)The second sentence is in the future, so the wording is correct as is.If the question was in the present, then you could use "would":If I were wanting to go, I would ask you. (But I am not.)Also, don't forget the comma between
Doctor DIf I wanted to go I would ask you. ["If I wanted to go" is in the past. "I would ask you" is the future. So this wording is wrong.]I find that I have to disagree very strongly on this point. This is a standard "second conditional" pattern.
Doctor DSo I would recast your sentence to put them both in the past:If I wanted to go (and get groceries), I would have asked you (to drive me there).Strange. I thought the set-up made it quite clear that the situation was not about the past at all, but about a possible future. It's more like "What would you do if you won a million dollars?" Thus, "What w
Doctor DThe second conditional form [past] would be:If I was wanting to go (and get groceries), I would ask you (if you could drive me there).Sounds regional to me, and not my region.
Doctor DIf I wanted to go I would ask you. ["If I wanted to go" is in the past. "I would ask you" is the future. So this wording is wrong.]Sorry, Doctor D, but you are simply wrong.