Both are correct. You can choose either one. CB
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Cool BreezeBoth are correct. You can choose either one.Thanks a lot. But what is the difference in meaning. Is there any difference?
AnonymousIs there any difference?I don't see any difference worth mentioning. The continuous tense perhaps suggests more clearly that you are still trying.
Cool BreezeI don't see any difference worth mentioning. The continuous tense perhaps suggests more clearly that you are still trying.I see. Does either one suggest that the trying has finished and I got the opportunity. Or do they convey that I am working to get the opportunity?
AnonymousDoes either one suggest that the trying has finished and I got the opportunityNow that you mention it, yes, I think the first sentence is better for this meaning. I would actually use the past simple for this meaning: I worked very hard for the past year to get this opportunity.
Cool Breeze I would actually use the past simple for this meaning: I worked very hard for the past year to get this opportunity.Got it. So the first sentence (present perfect) and the one you suggested (simple past) fit this meaning, but the present perfect continuous implies that I am still working for it, in this specific example. Have I understood correctl
Cool BreezePeople use English, and other languages, differently. There's a lot of disagreement about many things.I agree.
Cool Breeze Even the first sentence can be used even if the person has got the opportunity.Did you mean here the second sentence? Because I did say that (the first sentence (present perfect) and