join You had him join the event. You didn't have him joining the event. When you invited him, you said, "We'd like to have you join our event", not "We'd like to have you joining our event".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
CalifJimjoinYou had him join the event. You didn't have him joining the event.When you invited him, you said, "We'd like to have you join our event", not "We'd like to have you joining our event"."have" is like "experience" in this kind of context.CJThanks a lot, CJ. That was what I thought, but I doubted myself when I saw that sentence on one of my native fr
AnonymousWould this sentence also be correct "it was a pleasure that he (e.g. Dr. Jones) joined our event"?No. "It was a pleasure" takes a for ... to ... structure.
CalifJim AnonymousWould this sentence also be correct "it was a pleasure that he (e.g. Dr. Jones) joined our event"?No. "It was a pleasure" takes a for ... to ... structure.CJI see. But I did not use a for/to structure in my original sentence! What is a 'for' structure?
CalifJim AnonymousWould this sentence also be correct "it was a pleasure that he (e.g. Dr. Jones) joined our event"?No. "It was a pleasure" takes a for ... to ... structure.CJIs the .. (for) having .. (to) have .. what you meant by the 'to/for' structure (although the actual word 'for' would not be used)?
Anonymous 'I am glad that you joined our event'.I am glad that you came to our event.
AnonymousI did not use a for/to structure in my original sentence!That's why it's wrong. It was a pleasure for Dr. Jones to join our event was what I was thinking of, but that's ambiguous. It would have to be It was a pleasure for us for Dr. Jones to join our event. Of course you could change it a different way and have We were pleased tha
CalifJimIt was a pleasure for Dr. Jones to join our event was what I was thinking of, but that's ambiguous.But why would “.. a pleasure having him join ..” imply “.. a pleasure for him to join ..”? It is obvious to me that the pleasure was ours, not his!!
AnonymousBut why would “.. a pleasure having him join ..” imply “.. a pleasure for him to join ..”? It is obvious to me that the pleasure was ours, not his!!Right. That's why I rejected my first version.
AnonymousDid you mean in your first reply by ‘have you join’ meaning ‘experience’ that the person actually takes part in the event,
CalifJimRight. That's why I rejected my first versionI see. Then why did you say that the sentence was wrong? Isn’t it understandable?