0
S_s_sridhar Posted 22 years ago
Grammar

Sentence correction

Is the following sentence correct?

“It is better to avoid entering into that house alone”
  

Top answer

Delete the 'into', SS-- 'enter' means 'go into'.

  • Delete the 'into', SS-- 'enter' means 'go into'.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

15 Answers
0
Delete the 'into', SS-- 'enter' means 'go into'.
0
Could you correct the following also?

If you were me, you will also do the same

(I want to tell this in future tense only)
0
'If you were me, you would also do the same.' Very formally, you would replace 'me' with 'I'.
0
Mister Micawber,
Very formally, you would replace 'me' with 'I'.


Can you please elaborate more on why that is the case. It doesn't seem natural to me, but then again, I might not be accustomed to the "very formal" approach.

Thank you Mister Micawber.

MountainHiker
0
Me too. The copulative requires the nominative case. Very formally, some texts insist on 'It is I', though we all say 'it's me'. Similarly, if I were writing a business letter or an academic paper, I would write, 'if you had been I, you would have shot the proctor too.' In theory. On second thought, I take it back-- I don't think I'd ever use it.

Notice that some writers overshoot
0
Hi Mister Micawber,

I am usually pretty good at knowing whether to use "I" or "me." So I am surprised that it is, "If you were I..." is correct.

I went hunting on the 'net and found one grammar site that corrected from "I to me" and another that correct from "me to I."

I trust you are correct. It is just not the way I would ever say or write it.

Besides u
0
To know if anything is 'correct', what options do we have? (1) check a grammar book, (2) google or other statistical research, or (3) ask someone. I myself tend to walk the line between prescriptivism and descriptivism, relying more on either (1) or (2) to support whichever viewpoint suits my feeling on the matter.

In this case, (1) the grammar text offers me only marginal-- if any-- s
0
Mister Micawber,
Very formally, you would replace 'me' with 'I'.


I agree completely.

In a way, I can wrap my head around this.

1) I would wash my car.

2) If you were I, you would wash my car.

So I can see I=I, if you will.

By logical extension, is it, "If you were she, ...."

3) She should buy th
0
1. what must a family do to adopt a child

2. read this book about adoption

3. what a huge number of laws there are

4. approval for adoption may take a year or more

Related Questions