0
Jeff_999 Posted 21 years ago
Grammar
Sentence completion
Conceptually, it's hard to reconcile a defense attorney's ___ to ensure that false testimony is not knowingly put forward with the attorney's mandate to mount the most ___ defense conceivable for the client.
A. efforts ... cautious
B. duty ... powerful
C. inability ... eloquent
D. failure ... diversified
E. promise ... informed
I think this is the toughest one I've ever met. First I have no idea what the sentence is all about; second, I can't find the key words that would suggest the answer.
Will you help me out? Thank you.
A. efforts ... cautious
B. duty ... powerful
C. inability ... eloquent
D. failure ... diversified
E. promise ... informed
I think this is the toughest one I've ever met. First I have no idea what the sentence is all about; second, I can't find the key words that would suggest the answer.
Will you help me out? Thank you.
Top answer
Dear Jeff_999, It is my opinion that a defense must be eloquent or powerful. It is not otherwise a mandate. It is not hard to reconcile eloquence with inability.
- Dear Jeff_999, It is my opinion that a defense must be eloquent or powerful.
- It is not otherwise a mandate.
- It is not hard to reconcile eloquence with inability.
- It is therefore B.
- Kind regards, Goldmund
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
4 Answers
0
Dear Jeff_999,
It is my opinion that a defense must be eloquent or powerful. It is not otherwise a mandate. It is not hard to reconcile eloquence with inability. It is therefore B.
It is my opinion that a defense must be eloquent or powerful. It is not otherwise a mandate. It is not hard to reconcile eloquence with inability. It is therefore B.
00
Thank you, Goldmund.
Maybe "eloquent/powerful" defense indicates "putting forward false testimony". I got you point. Thank you. I just failed to understand the construction of the sentence in the first place. I didn't know the two things to be reconciled are "attorney's duty" and "mandate".
Maybe "eloquent/powerful" defense indicates "putting forward false testimony". I got you point. Thank you. I just failed to understand the construction of the sentence in the first place. I didn't know the two things to be reconciled are "attorney's duty" and "mandate".
00
was just wondering.. what's that u guys look at .. when u try to complete a sentence.. I normally follow my instict.. If I just feel this is right.. i try to stick to it..
is there any rule of the thumb that can be applied ??
is there any rule of the thumb that can be applied ??
00
Well, no rule of the thumb I'm afraid... It's the logical relationship between the stated and the offered words. But maybe logic may be a rule of the thumb?
0
Related Questions