Not really. It's not clear whether "subdued" is used correctly. Do you actually mean that the silence subdued him (caused him to be subdued), or was the silence a consequence of his being subdued?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
GPYIt's not clear whether "subdued" is used correctly. Do you actually mean that the silence subdued him (caused him to be subdued), or was the silence a consequence of his being subdued?Thank you for your help.
vsuresh"Silence absorbed him, swallowing all words" I was interpreting this line."subdued by silence" doesn't seem right to me in that case.
GPY"subdued by silence" doesn't seem right to me in that case.Can we say this?
vsureshCan we say this?Silence, all over, consumed him and with died his his thoughts and feelings.I think "silence consumed him" is OK. I'm not sure that "all over" adds much. Something has gone wrong at the end of the sentence. Possibly you meant to write "and with this died his thoughts and feelings".
GPYSomething has gone wrong at the end of the sentence. Possibly you meant to write "and with this died his thoughts and feelings".Yes. Thank you, GPY.