ceph In any case, would you think 3 & 4 can be the same meaning as 1 & 2? Thanks. I would say yes, because the core word is "reduce" and the time is future.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
cephIn any case, would you think 3 & 4 can be the same meaning as 1 & 2? Thanks.I would say yes, because the core word is "reduce" and the time is future.
IvanhrYou still need...said...........would....because it's reported speech.You don't 'need it'. If the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not obligatory.
fivejedjonYou don't 'need it'. If the situation reported is still true, then backshifting is not obligatory.Yes, right.
IvanhrThere's also no need for the article in front of "usage" (or "use").I do think the article "the" is needed.
dimsumexpressI do think the article "the" is needed.It's not wrong to use the article but you don't really need it. The sentence then simply means that you'll use less (and less) English with each lesson (of course this also implies that you'll use less English in the future than you do now and this implication is additionally emphasized with the article).