" That is probably too terse.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
hhttnstead of the original would we say 2) "You scored in four basketball games: 29, 45, 50, 60."That is probably too terse.
hhtt1) "You scored the following points in four basketball games: 29, 45, 50, 60."You could also say:
Instead of the original would we say
2) "You scored in four basketball games: 29, 45, 50, 60."
SoSaysSunnyYour scores in four basketball games were: 29, 45, 50, 60.There is no call for a colon there, SSS. Please try to contain yourself.
Mister MicawberThere is no call for a colon there, SSS.I merely followed the format that the OP provided. Colons can introduce a list, especially a data list.
Mister MicawberThere is no call for a colon there, SSS. Please try
SoSaysSunnyHow is my sentence substantially different from the other sentences you felt no need to correct?The scores in your sentence followed immediately after copulative 'were'.
fivejedjonThe scores in your sentence followed immediately after copulative 'were'.Okay. Does that make the colon absolutely incorrect / forbidden / anathema / chastisement-worthy? (genuinely curious)
SoSaysSunny. Does that make the colon absolutely incorrect / forbidden / anathema / chastisement-worthy?Yes.
Original Post (my emphasis):
"You scored the following points in four basketball games: 29, 45, 50, 60."
Instead of the original would we say:
"You scored in four basketball games: 29, 45, 50, 60."
My incorrect suggestion: Your scores in four basketball games were: 29, 45, 50, 60.