Here is a issue topic: Scandals—whether in politics, academia, or other areas—can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Does the word "scandals" mean a FALSE report maliciously uttered and tending to injure the reputation of a person?
Are scandals always FALSE?
I do not quite understand this issue. Would u please offer me some views toward this issue topic?
thank u in advance
Top answer
I don't think they're always false. No offense to anybody, but isn't the Watergate affair" a scandal? Or wasn't, rather.
— Pieanne
I don't think they're always false.
No offense to anybody, but isn't the Watergate affair" a scandal?
Or wasn't, rather.
On the other hand, many paparazzi start false ones...
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I don't think they're always false. No offense to anybody, but isn't the Watergate affair" a scandal? Or wasn't, rather. On the other hand, many paparazzi start false ones...
As Pieanne mentioned, scandals can be either true or false information. Your text implies that if people continue to talk about something, for example a corruption in the government, can absorb more public attention and result in investigation,.... So, scandals sometimes could give a better result than if for example a speech made by a person in the opposite party, ... Hope that it helps.
A "scandal" often brings malpractice to light suddenly and unexpectedly, and puts it on the front pages of the newspapers before governments or institutions have had a chance to coordinate their official response. Different ministers etc are then interviewed, and may give different answers to the same question. This allows journalists to prise open the story.