Well, it should be 'whom' as far as I know. Is it still not allowed then? What do these books say exactly?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousGrammar books say that "I am not the same man that I was" or "I am not the same man I was" is correct, but it's not correct to say "I am not the same man who I was." Why not?This involves a rather subtle point. "same man" can't be taken literally. There are not really two different men here, one not being the same as the other. It's impossible fo
ferdisAh, I see, because if you want to add whom to "I am a different man than I was back then." you end up with the same problem in "I am a different man than [the man whom] I was back then" and then 'that' should be used as you explained.Yes.
CalifJimBy the way, not directly related to the original question, it's who I was, not whom I was. was is a linking verb, so whom is not used.
I looked so different that no one knew who I was. (not whom I was.)
OK. I did this because I always change the word order to see which one to use. The man who
ferdisI understand that it should be "It was he" or "It is I" grammatically, but I thought everybody favoured 'him' or 'me' in those places. This can not be extrapolated to 'whom' then?Your analysis is "right on the money"!!!