0
Usenet Posted 21 years ago
Usage
Salute to the flag of USA was NAZI salute
I missed an earlier thread where people inquired about the salute to the flag. I am the person who made the historic discovery that the straight-armed salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis) came from the military salute in the USA, and from the original pledge of allegiance in government schools, and not from ancient Rome. http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
Eye popping photos are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html
and more terrifying articles are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge1.html
and at http://rexcurry.net/michael-medved.html
Three terms sum up popular myths: "Swastika" and "Nazi" and "Roman Salute." RexCurry.net exposed all three.
The "Roman salute" myth holds that the Nazi salute was from ancient Rome. The myth was refuted by the historic discovery that the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis) came from a national socialist in the USA who used a straight-arm salute as part of the original pledge of allegiance.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
The pledge of allegiance was written by a self-proclaimed National Socialist in the USA in 1892 (Francis Bellamy) who promoted "military socialism" and operated the "Nationalist" magazine and spread the straight-arm salute via kids in schools, three decades before the Nazis adopted similar behavior.
RexCurry.net also exposed the "Nazi" myth, that Nazis hate socialists. The word "Nazi" hides the actual name of the horrid party: the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The practice is so widespread that most people who use the word "Nazi" are ignorant of what the abbreviation abbreviates and why it ties into the pledge of allegiance and to earlier National Socialists in the USA. http://rexcurry.net/mediacover.html
and http://rexcurry.net/swastikamedia.html
and http://rexcurry.net/swastikaweb.html
Nazis always referred to themselves as "National Socialists" and never as "Nazis" and they always used the word "hakenkreuz" and not "swastika."
The "Swastika myth" is that the symbol of the Nazis was a swastika, and used as their "good luck" sign, or reversed for "evil." The use of the word "swastika" coincides with "Nazi" to hide the symbol's meaning for the horrid Party: Socialism.
Today, most people would never make the connection between the swastika's "S" shapes and "socialism" because most people do not know that the Nazis were the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
The trio of myths are examples of astounding historical facts that were deliberately shoved down Orwell's "memory hole."
(Oppose socialism and support libertarianism. To learn more see Rex Curry at http://rexcurry.net or contact (Email Removed) or (Email Removed) or (Email Removed) ).
Eye popping photos are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html
and more terrifying articles are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge1.html
and at http://rexcurry.net/michael-medved.html
Three terms sum up popular myths: "Swastika" and "Nazi" and "Roman Salute." RexCurry.net exposed all three.
The "Roman salute" myth holds that the Nazi salute was from ancient Rome. The myth was refuted by the historic discovery that the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis) came from a national socialist in the USA who used a straight-arm salute as part of the original pledge of allegiance.
http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html
The pledge of allegiance was written by a self-proclaimed National Socialist in the USA in 1892 (Francis Bellamy) who promoted "military socialism" and operated the "Nationalist" magazine and spread the straight-arm salute via kids in schools, three decades before the Nazis adopted similar behavior.
RexCurry.net also exposed the "Nazi" myth, that Nazis hate socialists. The word "Nazi" hides the actual name of the horrid party: the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The practice is so widespread that most people who use the word "Nazi" are ignorant of what the abbreviation abbreviates and why it ties into the pledge of allegiance and to earlier National Socialists in the USA. http://rexcurry.net/mediacover.html
and http://rexcurry.net/swastikamedia.html
and http://rexcurry.net/swastikaweb.html
Nazis always referred to themselves as "National Socialists" and never as "Nazis" and they always used the word "hakenkreuz" and not "swastika."
The "Swastika myth" is that the symbol of the Nazis was a swastika, and used as their "good luck" sign, or reversed for "evil." The use of the word "swastika" coincides with "Nazi" to hide the symbol's meaning for the horrid Party: Socialism.
Today, most people would never make the connection between the swastika's "S" shapes and "socialism" because most people do not know that the Nazis were the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
The trio of myths are examples of astounding historical facts that were deliberately shoved down Orwell's "memory hole."
(Oppose socialism and support libertarianism. To learn more see Rex Curry at http://rexcurry.net or contact (Email Removed) or (Email Removed) or (Email Removed) ).
Top answer
[/nq] This is grossly misleading, and I suspect purposely so. a) The magazine The Nationalist was the organ of the populist socialist Nationalist party, published from 1889-1891 (succeeded by The New Nation 1891-1894), and was Edward Bellamy's. Edward Bellamy was the author of Looking Backwards and Equality , and had a mildly socialist populist ideology.
- [/nq] This is grossly misleading, and I suspect purposely so.
- a) The magazine The Nationalist was the organ of the populist socialist Nationalist party, published from 1889-1891 (succeeded by The New Nation 1891-1894), and was Edward Bellamy's.
- Edward Bellamy was the author of Looking Backwards and Equality , and had a mildly socialist populist ideology.
- He was not a "National Socialist" in any modern meaning of the term.
- net are.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
69 Answers
0
[nq:1]The pledge of allegiance was written by a self-proclaimed National Socialist in the USA in 1892 (Francis Bellamy) who promoted "military socialism" and operated the "Nationalist" magazine and spread the straight-arm salute via kids in schools, three decades before the ***** adopted similar behavior.[/nq]
This is grossly misleading, and I suspect purposely so. a) The magazine The National
This is grossly misleading, and I suspect purposely so. a) The magazine The National
00
[nq:1]I missed an earlier thread where people inquired about the salute to the flag. I am the person who made ... shapes and "socialism" because most people do not know that the ***** were the National Socialist German Workers' Party. http://rexcurry.net/swastikaweb.html[/nq]
You're right. Socialism IS Nazism. C
You're right. Socialism IS Nazism. C
00
[nq:1]is based on at best stupidity. If these folks are not completely ignorant, then they are the kind of lying ******** that think that socialism and libertarianism are opposing principles.[/nq]
As we ALL now know, they are clearly both the same exact evil that has plagued the uncivilised world since the dawn of time.
As we ALL now know, they are clearly both the same exact evil that has plagued the uncivilised world since the dawn of time.
00
Your comments are grossly misleading, and I suspect purposely so. http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.htmla) The magazine The Nationalist was the organ of the socialist Nationalist party, published from 1889-1891 (succeeded by The New Nation 1891-1894), and was Edward Bellamy's. Edwa
00
0
[nq:1]Is there an award for Most Disinteresting Post?[/nq]
Oy!
Steny '08!
Oy!
Steny '08!
00
[nq:2]Is there an award for Most Disinteresting Post?[/nq]
[nq:1]Oy! Steny '08![/nq]
That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what I meant.
Mike G.
[nq:1]Oy! Steny '08![/nq]
That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what I meant.
Mike G.
00
[nq:2]Oy![/nq]
[nq:1]That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what I meant.[/nq]
It avoids another "I could/couldn't care less" thread.
[nq:1]That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what I meant.[/nq]
It avoids another "I could/couldn't care less" thread.
00
}> "Areff" (Email Removed) wrote in message
}>
}
}>>>Is there an award for Most Disinteresting Post? }
}>>Oy!
}
}> That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what I meant. }
} It avoids another "I could/couldn't care less" thread.
How is that different from Most Uninteresting Post, if that's what it avoids. How does
}>
}
}>>>Is there an award for Most Disinteresting Post? }
}>>Oy!
}
}> That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what I meant. }
} It avoids another "I could/couldn't care less" thread.
How is that different from Most Uninteresting Post, if that's what it avoids. How does
00
[nq:1]}>>>Is there an award for Most Disinteresting Post? } }>>Oy! } }> That's proper awardspeak. And "disinteresting" is exactly what ... it avoids. How does the post make him neutral about a contested issue if not? The question was well-Oy!ed. [/nq]
Let's check The Dictionary. Maybe we can find exactly what I found when I double-checked before posting. Yup yup.
Let's check The Dictionary. Maybe we can find exactly what I found when I double-checked before posting. Yup yup.
0
Related Questions