0
SheltieBites Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Roll From Side To Side

http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/31/travel/on-rafting-trip-running-into-trouble.html?pagewanted=2

"As our raft began to hit the rapids, we concentrated on staying in the boat. Bobbing up and down, our raft rolled from side to side, like a drunken sailboat."

Does anyone think that "from side to side" is redundant, since "roll" implies tilting from side to side?
  

Top answer

I don't think it's redundant, as the reader might not know that it would rarely roll from front to back. It's surely no more redundant that "bobbing up and down," which is definitely idiomatic. I'd say there's a difference between emphasis and redundancy.

  • I don't think it's redundant, as the reader might not know that it would rarely roll from front to back.
  • It's surely no more redundant that "bobbing up and down," which is definitely idiomatic.
  • I'd say there's a difference between emphasis and redundancy.
  • Edit.
  • I guess I've heard "bobbing from side to side," as in bobbing and weaving in a boxing match.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
I don't think it's redundant, as the reader might not know that it would rarely roll from front to back.
It's surely no more redundant that "bobbing up and down," which is definitely idiomatic.
I'd say there's a difference between emphasis and redundancy.

Edit. I guess I've heard "bobbing from side to side," as in bobbing and weaving in a boxing match. Sorry.
0
AvangiI don't think it's redundant, as the reader might not know that it would rarely roll from front to back.It's surely no more redundant that "bobbing up and down," which is definitely idiomatic.I'd say there's a difference between emphasis and redundancy.
I thought "roll" means tilting to one side? So if a ship rolls, i
0
SheltieBitesI thought "roll" means tilting to one side? So if a ship rolls, it could be that its bow dips and stern rises?
If it's a large ship, an experienced person would assume it's rolling from side to side, if there's no further context.

My point was that the author doesn't know the experience of his reader, and there's no harm in elaborating.

Related Questions