It's an adverb modifying the infinitive to come . Infinitives are verb forms. CJ
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Debpriya De to not goWhen you place any word between the to of an infinitive and the verb, you have "split an infinitive". The split infinitive has been considered a grammatical error for quite a long time; however, because it is used so often, some authorities are now inclined to accept it as correct.
CalifJimDebpriya DeThe split infinitive has been considered a grammatical error for quite a long time; however, because it is used so often, some authorities are now inclined to accept it as correct. According to some, there are cases where the meaning changes, but that doesn't apply in this case. You might be able to use the se
CalifJim The split infinitive has been considered a grammatical error for quite a long time; however, because it is used so often, some authorities are now inclined to accept it as correct. That's not the only reason it is accepted as correct.
'not to verb' and 'to not verb' have distinct grammatic roles.
I did that not to save mo
CalifJimWhat's wrong with
1) I did that in order not to waste time. It just doesn't sound like the best choice to me. 'in order to' is a set phrase that sounds most natural.
Of course "in order" is not needed, but I put it there in brackets to indicate what the natural-sounding sequence of words is, at least to me.
or2) I did that s
canadian45What I am contending is that 'to not verb' not only is not wrong or inelegant, but it is actually better than 'not to verb' in some situations.De gustibus non est disputandum. [H]