0
HSS Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

Roger! Roger That!

Hi, there.

I just wanted to confirm this. My feeling toward "Roger that!" and "Roger on that!" for affirming something is that they can be interchangeably used. Yes, they can, or no they cannot?

Hiro
  

Top answer

Yes.

  • Yes.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
-------
roger


Function: interjection

Etymology: from 3roger (standing for the initial letter r of received)
-- used especially in radio and signaling to indicate that a message has been received and understood or that the speaker agrees with what has been said


0
Yeeeessss....tentatively.

However, it is not something that we normally say. As Marius points out, it is imitating radio speech, and is not something that we actually say in other contexts unless we are doing it for comical effect.
0
Just gotten up, and noticed that I put up what didn't intend to put up for the subject title. It should have been "Roger That! Roger on That!" instead of "Roger! Roger That!"

Aaaanyhow ... Thanks, all, for your inputs. I'm a radio old-timer, having been in the world for the last thirty-some years since I was in the fifth grade, and I have been using the expressions without giving them too
0
Roger and out? What does that mean? I'm just curious, Nona.

Hiro

Related Questions