0
Shaved Posted 18 years ago
Linguistics Studies

Riversidean vs. Riversidian

0Hi, this is my first post here, though I've been using these forums for a few months to find answers at work. (I'm an editor for a construction and engineering firm.) 02br
02br
00I am inclined to go with '-ean' for a number of reasons, but I can't seem to find anything definite on this.02br
02br
00Worse, my 'go to' when our style guide doesn't cover something is the Chicago Manual of Style... They seem to favor the -ean version, but their examples include 'Aristotelian'... which confuses me greatly because it's exactly the opposite of their explanation.02br
02br
00 I'd appreciate any response I can get.... I've got an author who insists that Riversidian is corrrect, and I can't let reports go out like that. I just can't seem to find anything convincing enough to get it changed.0-
  

Top answer

02br 00Is it derived from "riverside"? 0-

  • 02br 00Is it derived from "riverside"?
  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

15 Answers
0
0 Could I ask you to clarify what the word relates to?02br
00Is it derived from "riverside"? 0-
0
0it referes to Riverside, California02br
02br
00 as in, Riversidean/ian sage scrub0-
0
0Philadelphian02br
02br
00Arcadian02br
02br
00Houstonian02br
02br
00I think the -ian for "resident of" is pretty well established. For the sage scrub, I would just use "Riversid."0-
0
0none of your examples end in 'e'02br
02br
00 Boolean, etc...0-
0
0That is descriptive, not used to mean "a resident of." 02br
02br
00I would not use an adjective form, period. I would use "Riverside" as the descriptor.0-
0
0it's the common name of the species... I can't get around the use of the word, otherwise I wouldn't have made the post02br
02br
00 I guess I'm looking for a rule that says when to use -ian and when to use -ean02br
02br
00I was relatively sure that the -ean is used when the root ends in 'e'0-
0
0Well, if it's a common name, then surely it must exist already? Why do you need to create a new name for it?02br
02br
00Ah:I've just seen two references on the state of California's Web site for Riverside sage scrub, and a heck of a lot for Riversidean as well as Riversidian.02br
02br
00There doesn't seem to be consensus on this at all. So does it it real
0
0Fish and Wildlife Service calls it 'riversidian' and 'riversidean' in the same sentence sometimes.02br
02br
00 If the agencies responsible for keeping track of this stuff were consistent, I wouldn't be asking. The point is that I've got an editor saying -ean, and an author saying -ian. And I can't find anything worthy of settling the issue.02br
02br
00I
0
1blockquote
01cite10shaved12cite12br
10The point is that I've got an editor saying -ean, and an author saying -ian. And I can't find anything worthy of settling the issue.12br
12br
10Sure you do - the editor overrules the writer when it's not an issue of fact. 12br
12br
10Why not just call it Alluvial sage s
0
0It really seems like there are no real conventions governing this..02br
02br
00I'm willing to accept any of the three as long as I can provide an explanation as to why. So far, I can't find anything that holds weight.02br
02br
00 So, I'm back at square 1, looking at government websites and trying to wrap my brain around why they are ok with so much incon

Related Questions