0
Fireflysaigon Posted 16 years ago
Grammar

Rita is exhausted today because ...

This is a sentence transformation question:

Rita is exhausted today because she has been working all day.
= If Rita weren't working hard all day, she wouldn't be exhausted.
Is it correct? I chose " type 2" for this kind of "sentence condition". I don't think "If she hadn't been working all day" is correct. I am so confused. Thanks in advance.
  

Top answer

Rita is exhausted today because she has been working. If she hadn't been working all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted. Or If Rita hadn't been working all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.

  • Rita is exhausted today because she has been working.
  • If she hadn't been working all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.
  • Or If Rita hadn't been working all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.
  • Or If (Rita/she) was not working hard all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.
  • So yes it really is correct, even though it may sound funny.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
Rita is exhausted today because she has been working.

If she hadn't been working all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.

Or If Rita hadn't been working all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.

Or If (Rita/she) was not working hard all day, she wouldn't be exauhsted.

So yes it really is correct, even though it may sound funny. You use were when you talk about more than
0
fireflysaigonRita is exhausted today because she has been working all day.
I think only the past perfect progressive is correct, even though your original is present perfect progressive.
To me, the context implies that the "working" has gone on all day, and the present tense "is exhausted" refers to a time after much of the action has taken p
0
If Rita hadn't been working all day..... is the first half of the type 3 conditional structure and the second half should be accompanied with " she wouldn't have been so tired."

with "wouldn't be so tired" in the second half of the construction, some considered it "mixed" conditi
0
dimsumexpressIf she hadn't married John and became a house wife, she would have been a very successful business woman.
I think instead of "became" (simple past) you mean "become" (past participle). Your sentences says "If she became a housewife she would have been a business woman."
If you want to distribute "hadn't" to both verbs, the forms must be th
0
Thanks Avangi, I realized the error after I posted it. I added that portion for the descriptive effect and in doing so, I got the tense confused. Well, that's what happened when your brain is working like an updated Pentium, sometimes, trying to multi-task can get you mixed up....
0
Been there. Done that.

Darn those verbs whose past participles are different from their simple pasts anyway!

Well, at least you didn't call it a typo. [Y]
0
fireflysaigonI don't think "If she hadn't been working all day" is correct.
Why not? It seems perfectly fine to me. The second sentence doesn't mean the exact same thing that the first sentence means, but that's OK. This is an exercise in grammar, not in logic.

This seems to be an exercise in "mixed conditionals", by the way. The contrafactual is

Related Questions