Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Opinions are divided on whether the problem of the poor countries could be solved through the money was paid by the wealthy one, or whether working out with other type of assistance would be better benefit to them. I believe both approaches would practically help these nations do way with poverty


On the other hand, financial aid is prerequisite to be supported for the undeveloped countries in socioeconomic development, but with strings attached. As almost everything couldn't be better without spending money, prosperous nation should appoint experts accompany with helping cash in order to avoifld money being corrupted and misused. Beside that, when an individual gets money without hard working, as the result, they become lazy and stop working which direct impact on poverty level of a country. Hence, money should be given for the right one. Investing in some projects such as upgrading the transport systems to help the unwealthy, however, proved to be properly and beneficially used, but it also has risk. To point out, many nations use financial aid to enrich those who help them such as army leaders. By donating cash in those ways, this problem will never be solved.

Therefore, there are many other types of aid, which are more practicall, for instace, employing in their firms or improving medical and education facilities. The wealth should support in machinery and technology by using specialist to show the guide how to use. For one thing, an agricultural country will be very grateful for the providing of hybrid seeds and irrigation. Those things remedy difficulties they face, increasing personal income and domestic economy of a realm. Another way of helping is ameliorating the education, which is the key to success. Students are future leaders of a state, should be trained in the good environmemt, which just has in developed countries, with commitment back to fatherland after studying

To conclude, I firmly believe that rich nations must have to support the poorest one by combinating two sides of this arguement together./data/user/0/com.samsung.android.app.notes/files/clipdata/clipdata_bodytext_220615_213708_924.sdocx->