0
Anonymous Posted 8 years ago
Grammar

Restrictive or non restrictive "who." Comma with who?

Should I put a comma before "who" in this sentence? Is it nonrestrictive here since the clause "who was suddenly chatting..." is not required to identify this basketball star? Or is no comma needed? Please help.

Hannah didn't know what to think about this basketball star who was suddenly chatting with her friends and completely ignoring his own friends.

  

Top answer

Hannah didn't know what to think about this basketball star who was suddenly chatting with her friends and completely ignoring his own friends . If the relative clause is not needed to identify which basketball star it was that was chatting with her friends, then it could be considered non-restrictive, and a comma would normally be included. Having said that, it looks restrictive to me and I'd omit the comma.

  • Hannah didn't know what to think about this basketball star who was suddenly chatting with her friends and completely ignoring his own friends .
  • If the relative clause is not needed to identify which basketball star it was that was chatting with her friends, then it could be considered non-restrictive, and a comma would normally be included.
  • Having said that, it looks restrictive to me and I'd omit the comma.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0

Hannah didn't know what to think about this basketball star who was suddenly chatting with her friends and completely ignoring his own friends.


If the relative clause is not needed to identify which basketball star it was that was chatting with her friends, then it could be considered non-restrictive, and a comma would normally be included.

Having said that, it

0

You might want to look at the context to see if there were any other basketball stars there.

0

Thank you. I've now understood clearly.

Related Questions