0
Diamondrg Posted 20 years ago
Grammar

restatement

In what way do these two sentences differ? Can one be the restatement of the other?

- We were not supposed to pay until the parcel was delivered.

- We didn't have to pay until the parcel was delivered.
  

Top answer

- Not supposed to means not obligated to. This is the tone and structure I would use in a dispute of purchase where the salesperson wanted you to pay for the purchase in full. B: We didn't have to pay until the parcel was delivered – This tone paints a picture of you explaining the payment and terms of purchase to someone.

  • - Not supposed to means not obligated to.
  • This is the tone and structure I would use in a dispute of purchase where the salesperson wanted you to pay for the purchase in full.
  • B: We didn't have to pay until the parcel was delivered – This tone paints a picture of you explaining the payment and terms of purchase to someone.
  • The two sentences, to me, don not carry the same message and therefore “were not supposed to” and “didn’t have to” are not interchangeable with this context.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0


A: We were not supposed to pay until the parcel was delivered.- Not supposed to means not obligated to. This is the tone and structure I would use in a dispute of purchase where the salesperson wanted you to pay for the purchase in full. .



B: We didn't have to pay until t
0
DiamondrgIn what way do these two sentences differ? Can one be the restatement of the other?

- We were not supposed to pay until the parcel was delivered.

- We didn't have to pay until the parcel was delivered.

- We were not supposed to pay until the parcel was delivered. --> Some people or
0
These are most certainly not restatements of one another!

In order, they mean:

We were required not to pay until delivery.
We were not required to pay until delivery.


CJ

Related Questions