0
Anonymous Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

Republic of Mauritius

Is there anythnig you would change grammatically speaking?

Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and French rule hence was consider part of the Dutch Republic and the French Republic respectively. But since its independence in 1968, it is no longer considered France.
  

Top answer

Hi, Is there anythnig you would change grammatically speaking? Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and French rule hence was consider part of the Dutch Republic and the French Republic respectively. But since its independence in 1968, it is no longer considered France.

  • Hi, Is there anythnig you would change grammatically speaking?
  • Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and French rule hence was consider part of the Dutch Republic and the French Republic respectively.
  • But since its independence in 1968, it is no longer considered France.
  • T he Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and French rule.
  • Hence, it was considered part of both the Dutch Republic and the French Republic.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
Hi,

Is there anythnig you would change grammatically speaking?

Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and French rule hence was consider part of the Dutch Republic and the French Republic respectively. But since its independence in 1968, it is no longer considered France.

The Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and Fre
0
There is 'grammatically correct' and whether the passage makes logical sense to the reader, as opposed to leaving him wondering.
The Republic of Mauritius was once under both Dutch and French rule: at the same time? Did the Dutch and French somehow share in governing the island? You wrote 'once was under both Dutch and French rule'. I think in

Related Questions