0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar
"Representative for..." or "Representative of..."
I'm writing an Article about Nepal and I have a question regarding a sentence.
which one is more correct?
"Kathmandu is not Representative of Nepal"
or
"Kathmandu is not representative for Nepal"
representative would be an adverb in this case.
i e: Kathmandu doesn't serve as a good example for Nepal as a whole.
which one is more correct?
"Kathmandu is not Representative of Nepal"
or
"Kathmandu is not representative for Nepal"
representative would be an adverb in this case.
i e: Kathmandu doesn't serve as a good example for Nepal as a whole.
Top answer
Hi, I'm writing an Article about Nepal and I have a question regarding a sentence. which one is more correct? "Kathmandu is not r epresentative of Nepal" Yes, but no capital 'r'.
- Hi, I'm writing an Article about Nepal and I have a question regarding a sentence.
- which one is more correct?
- "Kathmandu is not r epresentative of Nepal" Yes, but no capital 'r'.
- or "Kathmandu is not representative for Nepal" No.
- representative would be an adverb in this case.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Hi,
I'm writing an Article about Nepal and I have a question regarding a sentence.
which one is more correct?
"Kathmandu is not representative of Nepal" Yes, but no capital 'r'.
or
"Kathmandu is not representative for Nepal" No.
representative would be an adverb in this case. It's an adjective.
i e: Kathmandu doesn't serve
I'm writing an Article about Nepal and I have a question regarding a sentence.
which one is more correct?
"Kathmandu is not representative of Nepal" Yes, but no capital 'r'.
or
"Kathmandu is not representative for Nepal" No.
representative would be an adverb in this case. It's an adjective.
i e: Kathmandu doesn't serve
0
Related Questions