Does a. sound correct to you without "whom"?
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
English 1b3Why can't we omit the relative pronoun in a but can in b? a. I sent an email to our agency whom I asked to send the relevant information to you. b. This is the woman whom I wish to marry.The omissibilty of a relative word depends primarily on whether the relative clause is intended to be supplementary (non-defining), or integrated (defining).
James M"I sent an email to our agency whom I asked to send the relevant information to you."Now -- for the sake of analysis -- let's rearrange the words in "regular" order:"I sent an email to our agency I asked whom to send the relevant information to you."As you can see, "whom" is the subject of the infinitive "to send." According to my books, you cannot delete the relati
BillJ... cannot be omitted at all if the clause is supplementary (non-defining), which this one clearly is.I guess it's not so clear to me. Can you spell out what clues I am missing?
English 1b3Why can't we omit the relative pronoun in a but can in b?Let me try a different explanation, maybe the 'nontechnical' equivalent of BillJ's explanation.
a. I sent an email to our agency whom I asked to send the relevant information to you.
b. This is the woman whom I wish to marry.
English 1b3. I love Lisa whom I wish to marry (non-defining relative clause) Correctb. I love Lisa I wish to marry (non-defining relative clause) Incorrectc. I love this woman whom I wish to marry. (non-defining) Correctd. I love this woman I wish to marry. (defining) CorrectYou use a defining relative clause when it's necessary to identify the noun - it restr
CalifJimBillJ... cannot be omitted at all if the clause is supplementary (non-defining), which this one clearly is.I guess it's not so clear to me. Can you spell out what clues I am missing?There's nothing in the relative clause that restricts the denotation of 'our agency'. It's just a simple statement about what was sent and to whom:
BillJnothing in the relative clause that restrictsOK. I took the absence of a comma to be the OP's attempt to make a restrictive clause somehow and an implicit request to fix it so it would be a restrictive clause.