0
Rafaelpedrop Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Relative clauses

Compare the two sentences below:

The fact that Jim smokes...

The pipe that Jim smokes...

Why can the first sentence be transformed into: “That John smokes is a fact” but the second *”That John smokes is a pipe” cannot?



why one could say:

The pipe which John smokes.... but not

The fact which John smokes.



  

Top answer

By how the sentences were written,I don't believe I can agree with you. To make it a sentence with relative clause, we can say: "It's a fact that Jim smokes/ is a smoker". By just using fragments likes: The fact that...

  • By how the sentences were written,I don't believe I can agree with you.
  • To make it a sentence with relative clause, we can say: "It's a fact that Jim smokes/ is a smoker".
  • By just using fragments likes: The fact that...
  • The reason that ....
  • it doesn't make it a relative sentence.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
By how the sentences were written,I don't believe I can agree with you.

To make it a sentence with relative clause, we can say: "It's a fact that Jim smokes/ is a smoker".

By just using fragments likes:

The fact that...

The reason that ....

it doesn't make it a relative sentence.

To me, the posted sentences are not relative clauses by definit
0
rafaelpedropThe fact that Jim smokes... The pipe that Jim smokes...
The first is an example of a content clause or an appositive clause. It is not a relative clause. These structures consist of a noun like fact or belief followed by a clause introduced by the complementizer that (never which). Being a complementizer, and not a

Related Questions