0
Moon7296 Posted 13 years ago
Grammar

relative clause which / that (in this sentence)

A : What have you been doing?

B: I have been studying studied linguistics, which was one of the subjects in the exam I took recently.

Q) Two native speakers chose "which" instead of "that" in "B".
Is there any reason why "which" is more natural than "that"? (By the way, "that" without a comma before it sounds also OK too, doesn't it?)
  

Top answer

The relative clause is non-defining, and therefore 'that' is incorrect; only 'which' is used in such clauses. 'That' with no preceding comma would make in a defining relative clause. That would not be appropriate in this sentence.

  • The relative clause is non-defining, and therefore 'that' is incorrect; only 'which' is used in such clauses.
  • 'That' with no preceding comma would make in a defining relative clause.
  • That would not be appropriate in this sentence.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
The relative clause is non-defining, and therefore 'that' is incorrect; only 'which' is used in such clauses.

'That' with no preceding comma would make in a defining relative clause. That would not be appropriate in this sentence.
0
AnonymousThe relative clause is non-defining, and therefore 'that' is incorrect
I thought "studied linguistics" is defined by a relative clause either "which" or "that" in the sentence. But what you mean is the relative clause "which?" (that?) is non-definining for "studied linguistics"? (I know a relative clause "that" preceded by a comma can't be used thus n

Related Questions